Login to start your download.

773 words

Search Contributor/Columnist photo gallery

Graeme Lee RowlandsSince 1964, the Columbia River Treaty has played a key role in governing river flows and management priorities in the transboundary Columbia River Basin.

Since last May, the federal governments of the U.S. and Canada have been negotiating a new deal for the treaty, which will help direct the basin’s future. The discussion surrounding this negotiation and who gets to participate reveals what has changed in the last 55 years – and what remains the same.

When the original treaty was negotiated, the U.S. and Canada chose to disregard the health of ecosystems and fish populations. Instead, they created a treaty that manages river flows solely to maximize hydroelectric generation and provide conservative flood control for downstream communities.

They also chose not to involve or consult any of the basin’s Indigenous nations in the process.

Today, both the U.S. and Canada have accepted in principle that the renegotiated treaty must hold ecosystem function as a co-equal purpose alongside hydroelectric and flood control. This is a sign of real progress.

To the contrary, involvement of Indigenous nations has been reminiscent of the treaty’s exclusionary past. On both sides of the border, Indigenous nations participated heavily in the review processes leading up to the renegotiation. So it came as a shock when the U.S. and Canadian governments announced last May that Indigenous nations would be excluded from the negotiations.

FROM CAMROSE VOICE
Reconciliation and healing require forward perspectives
We must embrace who we are as Canadians, the values that set us apart from the rest of the world
The Camrose Voice is a Troy Media partner news site

However, citing their renewed commitment to reconciliation with Indigenous peoples for historic and ongoing wrongs, on April 26 the Canadian government announced a reversal of its prior decision. The three First Nations on the Canadian side of the basin will now have official observer status in the negotiating sessions.

The U.S. has an ethical obligation to follow suit by inviting the 15 tribes on the American side of the basin to join the negotiating sessions as official observers, alongside their Canadian counterparts.

Writing about the ongoing legacy of African American slavery and oppression in the U.S., black American scholar Ta-Nehisi Coates writes, “until we reckon with our compounding moral debts, America will never be whole.”

The same is true for our moral debt to the original stewards of the land on which we live. Until Indigenous nations are actually involved as sovereigns and not merely consulted like stakeholders, the legal and moral integrity of our decisions about the land and water we share will not stand the test of time.

As Grand Chief Stewart Phillip of the Okanagan Nation Alliance said in a statement, while certainly overdue, this was a courageous decision on Canada’s part. In a land where Indigenous voices and human rights have been systematically suppressed for centuries and where governments are still failing to fully uphold their commitments to the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, inviting Indigenous nations into the conversation about our shared future in this place is a radical move.

Since 2008, Canada has been trying to make itself whole through a process known as reconciliation. The goal is to honestly and openly reckon with its history of attempted cultural genocide against Indigenous peoples through the Indian Residential School System it operated until 1996.

Though many fewer Americans seem to be aware of it, the U.S. has a very similar history. But on this side of the border, we as a people have not yet attempted to reckon with this legacy in the same way. Shamefully, our governments have mostly waited to act until forced to do so by court orders such as the 1974 Boldt Decision, which recognized native treaty rights to co-manage northwest fisheries.

The current renegotiation of the Columbia River Treaty is an opportunity for us as Americans to be courageous. We need courage to see the truth of our own history. We need courage to admit when we’ve made a mistake. And we need courage to invite our neighbours who have cared for this land since time immemorial to join us in figuring out how we may all thrive here in our common future.

As they continue to hold negotiating sessions, our treaty negotiators stand on the front lines of Columbia Basin and American history. We must encourage them to follow Canada’s lead in charting a better path forward towards political, ecological and social wholeness for us all – native and non-native neighbours alike.

An American living on both sides of the border, Graeme Lee Rowlands is a published researcher and educator who studied at Quest University Canada, in Squamish, B.C. He serves as the program co-ordinator of the Columbia River Field School and has travelled the entire length of the Columbia River by bicycle, canoe and kayak to learn directly from people and place.


The views, opinions and positions expressed by columnists and contributors are the author’s alone. They do not inherently or expressly reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of our publication.

© Troy Media – All Rights Reserved
Trusted editorial content provider to media outlets across Canada
  Terms and Conditions of use

Looking for editorial content for your publication or website?
Subscribe today!

Or join our growing Affiliate, Associate and Partner news sites network.
(View the benefits)

Tags: , , , , , , ,